Book reviw of Flax, R., Hellín, L., Hernández, G., Martínez Romagosa, M., Nudelman, M., Raiter, A., Testoni, F., Venturini, A. V., Zukerfeld, G. y Zullo, J. (2023). Heteróclito y multiforme: debates y propuestas para analizar discursos
Abstract
Book review
Downloads
References
Chouliaraki, L. y Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity. Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hodge, R. (2017). Social Semiotics for a Complex World. Cambridge: Polity.
Hodge, R. y Kress, G. (1979). Language as ideology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kress, G. (2017 [2014]). ¿What is mode?. En Jewitt, C. (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. y van Leeuwen, T. (2006 [1996]). Reading Images. The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728
Kress, G. y van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002008
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London / New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078
Fairclough, N. (2005). Critical discourse analysis. Marges linguistiques, 9, pp. 76–94.
Lakoff, G. (2007 [2004]). No pienses en un elefante. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it Matters How We Frame the Environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), pp. 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903529749
Lakoff, G. y Johnson, M. (2015 [1980]). Metáforas de la vida cotidiana. Madrid: Cátedra.
Raiter, A. (2016). Representaciones sociales. En Raiter, A. y Zullo, J. (Eds.), Al filo de la lengua: medios publicidad y política (pp. 15–31). San Fernando: La Bicicleta.
Rosanvallon, P. (2003). Por una historia conceptual de lo político. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Volóshinov, V. (2009 [1929]). El marxismo y la filosofía del lenguaje. Buenos Aires: Godot.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ailén Campos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Texts in Process (TEP) is a non-commercial open-access scholarly journal governed by a Creative Commons Recognition 4.0 International license. It follows a full and unrestricted open access, without charges or fees for shipping, reviewing, processing and publishing articles. Users can read, download without registering, distribute, print or link the complete texts of numbers and articles, without the permission of the editors or authors. There is also no charge to publish (APCs), being applicable to the entire editorial process. The authors retain their intellectual rights at all times.
ASICE-EDICE Programme has always believed that non-commercial, open, unlimited and unrestricted access to specialized academic publications is a vehicle for academic freedom and scientific rigor. It adheres and shares the Declaration of Mexico and DORA to guarantee the protection of academic and scientific production in Open Access.
