Stereotypes and humor in advertising discourse. The case of two television campaigns of V&T by Nestea
Abstract
All advertising discourse is created from argumentation mechanisms; however, these vary, generally, depending on the effectism sought, so that the basic patterns can be altered to produce a certain reaction in the recipient. This is the case of counter-argumentation and irony, which, humorously, pervade current audiovisual advertising. Counter-argumentative, refutatory and ironic advertising speeches are especially interesting at a sociolinguistic level, since the keys necessary to disambiguate the message lie in the topoi or common places shared by the speaking communities, and the addressee has to resort to them to capture the sense of the speech. The construction of stereotypes, so present in advertisements, also depends on knowledge of the world, society and culture. Advertising recreates stereotypes as a strategy for selecting the audience and mimicking the recipient, so that it produces an immediate identification, which captures their attention and arouses their interest in the product. In this way, the audiovisual advertising discourse is created according to stereotypical social behavior patterns that are reflected not only through the image but also in the linguistic manifestations, which try to emulate those of the stereotype portrayed. This is shown by the discursive analysis carried out from two advertising campaigns for the same product, V&T by Nestea: one of them aimed at a female audience and the other, at a male audience; where it is appreciated how the communicative strategies are adapted to the addressee to build a discourse that is linguistically associated with the stereotype and produces the identification between both.
Downloads
References
Adam, J. M. y Bonhome, M. (1997). La argumentación publicitaria. Madrid: Cátedra, 2000.
Amossy, R. (2000). L’argumentation dans le discours. Paris: Nathan Université.
Anscombre, J. C. y Ducrot, O. (1988). La argumentación en la lengua. Madrid: Gredos, 1994.
Calero Fernández, M. Á. (2013). Análisis sociolingüístico de las creencias en torno al habla femenina y al habla masculina. En Montoya Abat, B. y Mas i Miralles, A. (Coords.); Gimeno-Menéndez, F. (Hom.), Studia linguistica in honorem Francisco Gimeno Menéndez (pp. 353-374). San Vicent del Raspeig: Publicacions de la Universitat d’Alacant.
Estévez-Rionegro, N. (2021). Estrategias discursivas de la denominada antipublicidad. En Cid Fernández, X. M., García Señorán, Mª del M., Mociño González, I. (Coords.), Novas realidades, novas reflexións e propostas de acción (pp. 207-219). Santiago de Compostela: Andavira.
García Mouton, P. (2003). Así hablan las mujeres: curiosidades y tópicos del uso femenino del lenguaje. Madrid: La esfera de los libros.
Gómez Torrego, L. y Robles Ávila, S. (2014). Transgresiones idiomáticas en el lenguaje de la publicidad. Madrid: Cátedra
Jakobson, R. (1963). Ensayos de lingüística general. Barcelona: Planeta, 1985.
López Díaz, M. (2008). El humor como procedimiento discursivo en los anuncios publicitarios. Revie Romane, 43 (1), pp. 25-62. https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.43.1.03lop
López Díaz, M. (2010). Quand un discours feint d’argumenter contre lui-même. En Iliescu, M., Sillei-Runggaldier H. y Danler, P. (Eds.), Actes du XXV Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes (Innsbruck, 3-8 septembre 2007) (pp. 467-476). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110231922.5-467
Lozano Domingo, I. (1995). Lenguaje femenino, lenguaje masculino. ¿Condiciona nuestro sexo la forma de hablar? Madrid: Minerva Ediciones.
Perelman, C. y Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Perelman, C. (1969). Le Champ de l'argumentation. Bruxelles: Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles.
Plantin, C. (1998). La argumentación. Barcelona: Ariel.
Roch, E. (1977). Human Categorization. En Warren, N. (Ed.), Advances in Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 1-72). London: London Academic Press.
Romero Gualda, M. V. (2006). Lo imprevisible en el mensaje publicitario. En Casado Velarde, M., González Ruiz, R. y Romero Gualda, M. V. (Coords.), Análisis del discurso: lengua, cultura, valores: Actas del I Congreso Internacional (Vol. 1, pp. 775-788) Madrid: Arco Libros.
Romero Gualda, M. V. (2010). Persuasión y sintaxis publicitaria. En Robles Ávila, S. y Romero Gualda, M. V. (Coords.), Publicidad y lengua española: un estudio por sectores (pp. 150-162). Zamora: Comunicación Social Ediciones y Publicaciones.
Salway, A. y Martinec, R. (2002). Some ideas for modeling image-text combinations. http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/508/1/fulltext.pdf. Fecha de consulta: 20/11/2021
Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don´t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Ballantine.
Urbina Fonturbel, R. (2020). La función del ‘delectare’ en la argumentación publicitaria: el humor como estrategia persuasiva en la publicidad. Language Design: Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics, Vol. extra 1, pp. 17-30.
Urbina Fonturbel, R. (2018). El humor en la publicidad desde la perspectiva de la retórica y el análisis del discurso. Actio Nova: Revista de Teoría de la Literatura y Literatura Comparada, Vol. extra 2, pp. 44-72.
Corpus documental
Versión femenina: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYP1_1Hf414 (minuto 0:15 a 0:45) Fecha de consulta: 20/11/2021.
Versión masculina: https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4pfp3 Fecha de consulta: 20/11/2021.
Texts in Process (TEP) is a non-commercial open-access scholarly journal governed by a Creative Commons Recognition 4.0 International license. It follows a full and unrestricted open access, without charges or fees for shipping, reviewing, processing and publishing articles. Users can read, download without registering, distribute, print or link the complete texts of numbers and articles, without the permission of the editors or authors. There is also no charge to publish (APCs), being applicable to the entire editorial process. The authors retain their intellectual rights at all times.
ASICE-EDICE Programme has always believed that non-commercial, open, unlimited and unrestricted access to specialized academic publications is a vehicle for academic freedom and scientific rigor. It adheres and shares the Declaration of Mexico and DORA to guarantee the protection of academic and scientific production in Open Access.