Studies on (im)politeness and facework on social networks
Some remarks towards a state of the art
Abstract
This article is a brief literature review about the research that has emerged in recent years concerning (im)politeness and facework strategies carried out in social networks. We have analyzed how the key areas identified by Spencer-Oatey (2000) in her rapport management model have been studied: the illocutionary, the participatory, the stylistic and the discursive scopes. It will allow us to demonstrate how social networks promote the emergence of new channels of interaction through computer-mediated communication which have been pointed out by researchers in discourse analysis.
Downloads
References
Acosta, G. L. (2012). Gestión de pasiones y polarización en las redes sociales. Un análisis del aplicativo Grupos en Facebook. Discurso y Sociedad 6 (4), pp. 684-719.
Arundale, R. B. (2006). Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research, 2, pp. 193-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/PR.2006.011
Attardo, S., Hempelmann, C. y Di Maio, S. (2002). Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: Modelling incongruities and their resolutions. Humor, 16 (2), pp. 3-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humr.2002.004
Bedijs, K., Held, G. y Maass, C. (Eds.) (2014). Face Work and Social Media. Berlin: Lit Verlag.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. y Kasper, G. (1989). Cross Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Bou-Franch, P., Lorenzo-Dus, N. y Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2012). Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, pp. 501-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01579.x
boyd, d. y Ellison, N. (2008). Social networksites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, pp. 210-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
boyd, d., Golder, S. y Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet tweet retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawai, IEEE Press. Recuperado de: http://www.danah.org/papers/TweetTweetRetweet.pdf (05-02-2015).
Bravo, D. (Ed.) (2005). Estudios de la (des)cortesía en español. Categorías conceptuales y aplicaciones a corpora orales y escritos. Buenos Aires: Dunken.
Briz Gómez, A. (2007). Límites para el análisis de la conversación. Órdenes y unidades: turno, intervención y diálogo. RILI. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 1 (9), pp. 23-27.
Brown, P. y Levinson, S. C. (1978 [1987]). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bucholtz, M. y Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7, pp. 585-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
Caro Castaño, L. (2012). La encarnación del yo en las redes sociales digitales: identidad mosaico. Telos, 91, pp. 59-68.
Chen, R. (1993). Responding to compliments: a contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 20, pp. 49-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90106-Y
Chew, C. y Eysenbach, G. (2010). Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS ONE 5 (11). Recuperado de: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0014118
(05-02-2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014118
Cortés Rodríguez, L. y Camacho Adarve, M. M. (2005). Unidades de segmentación y marcadores del discurso: elementos esenciales en el procesamiento discursivo oral. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25 (3), pp. 349-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3
Cunha, E. et al. (2011). Analyzing the dynamic evolution of hashtags on Twitter: a language-based approach. Proceedings of the Workshop on Language and Social Media, Portland, Oregon, pp. 58-65. Recuperado de:
http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W11-0708 (05-02-2015).
Dann, S. (2010). Twitter content classification. First Monday 15 (12). Recuperado de: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2745/2681 (05-02-2015).
Davis, B. (2013). Hashtag politics: the polyphonic revolution of #Twitter. Pepperdine Journal of Communication Research, 1 (4), pp. 15-22. Recuperado de: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=pjcr (05-02-2015).
Dayter, D. (2014). Self-praise in microblogging. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, pp. 91-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.021
De Andrea, D. C., Shaw, A. S. y Levine, T. R. (2010). Online Language: The Role of Culture in Self-Expression and Self-Construal on Facebook. Journal of language and social psychology, 29, pp. 425-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X10377989
Di Próspero, C. E. (2011). Autopresentación en Facebook: un yo para el público. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios sobre Cuerpos, Emociones y Sociedad (RELACES) , 3 (6), pp. 44-53.
Díaz Pérez, J. C. (2012). Pragmalingüística del disfemismo y la descortesía. Los actos de habla hostiles en los medios de comunicación virtual, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Recuperado de: http://e-archivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/15682 (05-02-2015).
Díaz Pérez, J. C. (2014). Creatividad léxica y descortesía en los medios de comunicación virtual. Revista de filología, 32, pp. 81-98.
Dynel, M. (2012). Swearing methodologically: the (im)politeness of expletives in anonymous commentaries on Youtube. Journal of English Studies 10, pp. 25-50.
Dynel, M. (2014). Participation framework underlying YouTube interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 73, pp. 37-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.001
Espel, M. (2010). ¿Es Youtube una red social?. Solo Marketing. Recuperado de: http://www.solomarketing.es/%C2%BFes-youtube-una-red-social (05-02-2015).
Fraser, B. (1980). Conversational mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 4, pp. 341-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(80)90029-6
Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, pp. 219-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N
Fraser, B. y Nolen, W. (1981). The association of deference with linguistic form. International Journal of Sociology of Language, 27, pp. 93-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1981.27.93
Frobenius, M. (2011). Beginning a monologue: The opening sequence of video blogs. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (3), pp. 814-827. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.018
Frobenius, M. (2014). Audience design in monologues: How vloggers involve their viewers. Journal of Pragmatics, 72, pp. 59-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.008
Fuentes Rodríguez, C. (1995). Modalidad y conexión en el lenguaje coloquial. Español Actual, 63, pp. 175-190.
Fuentes Rodríguez, C. (2010). Ideología e imagen: ocultación en la prensa de la violencia social o lo políticamente correcto. Discurso y sociedad, 4 (4), pp. 853-892.
Gallardo Paúls, B. (1996). Análisis conversacional y pragmática del receptor. Valencia: Episteme.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2010). The YouTubification of politics, impoliteness and polarization. En Rotimi, T. (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Discourse Behaviour and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction (pp. 540-563). IGI Global.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P., Lorenzo-Dus, N. y Bou-Franch, P. (2013). Relational work in anonymous, asynchronous communication: A study of (dis)affiliation on YouTube. En Kecskes, I. y Romero-Trillo, J. (Eds.). Linguistic aspects of intercultural pragmatics (pp. 343-365). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Garrido Medina, J. (1997). Estilo y texto en la lengua. Madrid: Gredos.
Goffman, E. (1959 [2006]). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Nueva York: Doubleday Anchor Books. Traducción al español: La representación de la persona en la vida cotidiana. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
Golato, A. (2002). German compliment responses. Journal of Pragmatics 32, pp. 29-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00040-6
Grasmuck, S., Martin, J. y Zhao, S. (2009). Ethno-racial identity displays on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15 (1), pp. 158-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01498.x
Hardaker, C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 6 (2), pp. 215-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.011
Harley, D. y Fitzpatrick, G. (2009). YouTube and intergenerational communication: The case of Geriatric 1927. Universal Access in the Information Society, 8, pp. 5-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-008-0127-y
Herbert, R. K. (1989). The ethnography of English compliments and compliment responses: a contrastive sketch. En Olesky, K. (Ed.). Contrastive Pragmatics (pp. 5-35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Herring, S. (2001). Computer-Mediated Discourse. En Schiffin, D., Tannen, D. y Hamilton, H. E. (Eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 612-634). Oxford: Blackwell.
Honeycutt, C. y Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawai, HI: IEEE. Recuperado de: http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/honeycutt.herring.2009.pdf (05-02-2015).
Java, A. et al. (2007). Why we Twitter. Understanding microblogging and community. 9th WEBKDD Workshop, San José, CA. Recuperado de: http://aisl.umbc.edu/resources/369.pdf (05-02-2015).
Jones, G. y Schieffelin, B. (2009). Talking text and talking back: ‘my BFF Jill’ from Boob Tube to YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, pp. 1050-1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01481.x
Kaul de Marlangeon, S. y Cordisco, A. (2014). La descortesía verbal en el contexto político-ideológico de las redes sociales. Revista de Filología de la Universidad de la Laguna, 32, pp. 145-161.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1987). La description des échanges en analyse conversationalle: l’exemple du compliment. DRLAV Revue de linguistique, 36, pp. 1-53.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (2000). Gestion des conflits et constitution de coalitions dans les polylogues. En Bustos Tovar, J.J. de et al. (Eds.). Lengua, Discurso, Texto (pp. 53-69, vol. I). Madrid: Visor Libros.
Kim, J. (2009). I want to be different from others in cyberspace. The role of visual similarity in virtual group identity. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (1), pp. 88-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.06.008
Knapp, M. L., Hopper, R. y Bell, R.A. (1984). Compliments: a descriptive taxonomy. Journal of Communication, 34 (4), pp. 12-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02185.x
Lakoff, R. (1973). The Logic of Politeness: Or, Minding your p’s and q’s. Papers from the Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 9, pp. 292-305.
Lange, P. G. (2014). Commenting on YouTube rants: Perceptions of inappropriateness or civic engagement? Journal of Pragmatics, 73, pp. 53-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.004
Lara, T. (2012). Twitter y sus funciones comunicativas. Tíscar.com. Recuperado de: http://tiscar.com/2012/03/11/twitter-y-sus-funciones-comunicativas (05-02-2015).
Lavandera, B. (1988). The social pragmatics of politeness forms. En Amnon, U. y Dittma, N. (Eds.). Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society (pp. 1196-1204, vol. 2). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Locher, M. A. (2004). Power and politeness in action. Disagreements in oral communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110926552
Locher, M. A. (2010). Introduction: Politeness and impolitenessin computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research, 6, pp. 1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.001
Locher, M. A. y Watts, R. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1 (1), pp. 9-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
Locher, M. A. y Bolander, B. (2015). Humour in microblogging: Exploiting linguistic humour strategies for identity construction in two Facebook focus groups. En Dynel, M. y Chovanec, J. (Eds.). Interaction and Participation in the (New) Media, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lönnqvist, J. E. et alii (2014). The five-factor model of personality and degree and transitivity of Facebook social networks. Journal of Research in Personality, 50 (1), pp. 98-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.03.009
López Sobejano, J. (2012). Redes sociales. En Tascón, M. (dir.). Escribir en Internet. Guía para los nuevos medios y las redes sociales (pp. 151-178). Madrid: Fundéu-BBVA.
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2009). Anonymity and impoliteness –a comparative study of Facebook and YouTube. Paper presented at the Applied Linguistics Research Seminar Series, Swansea University, March 2009.
Lorenzo-Dus, N., Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. y Bou-Franch, P. (2011). On-line polylogues and impoliteness: The case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube video. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (10), pp. 2578-2593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005
Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2013). Just click ‘Like’: Computer-mediated responses to Spanish compliments. Journal of Pragmatics, 51, pp. 47-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.003
Maíz-Arévalo, C. y García-Gómez, A. (2013). You look terrific! Social evaluation and relationships in online compliments. Discourse Studies, 15 (3), pp. 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445613490011
Mancera Rueda, A. (2014). Cortesía en 140 caracteres: Interacciones en Twitter entre periodistas y prosumidores. Revista de Filología de la Universidad de la Laguna, 32, pp. 163-181.
Mancera Rueda, A. y Pano Alamán, A. (2013). El discurso político en Twitter. Análisis de mensajes que “trinan”. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Mancera Rueda, A. y Helfrich, U. (2014). La crisis en 140 caracteres: el discurso propagandístico en la red social Twitter. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación, 12, pp. 59-86.
Mancera Rueda, A. y Pano Alamán, A. (en prensa). Valores sintáctico-discursivos de las etiquetas en Twitter. Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación.
Marwick, A. y boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, contextcollapse, and the imagined audience. New Media and Society, 13 (1), pp. 114-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
Menna, L. (2012). Nuevas formas de significación en red: el uso de las #etiquetas en el movimiento 15M. Estudios de lingüística del español, 34. Recuperado de: http://elies.rediris.es/elies34/Tesina_L-Menna.pdf (05-02-2015).
Miller, V. (2008). New media, networking and phatic culture. Convergence, 14 (4), pp. 387-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354856508094659
Moalla, A. (2015). Incongruity in the generation and perception of humor on Facebook in the aftermath of the Tunisian revolution. Journal of Pragmatics, 75, pp. 44-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.008
Orihuela, J. L. (2008). Internet: la hora de las redes sociales. Nueva Revista 119, pp. 57-62. Recuperado de: http://www.fundacionunir.net/items/show/1801 (05-02-2015).
Orihuela, J. L. (2011). Mundo Twitter. Madrid: Alienta Editorial.
Page, R. (2012). The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: the role of hashtags. Discourse & Communication, 6, pp. 181-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1750481312437441
Page, R. (2014). Saying ‘sorry’: Corporate apologies posted on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 62, pp. 30-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.12.003
Pano Alamán, A. y Mancera Rueda, A. (2014a). La ‘conversación’ en Twitter: las unidades discursivas y el uso de marcadores interactivos en los intercambios con parlamentarios españoles en esta red social. Estudios de lingüística del español, 35, pp. 243-277. Recuperado de: http://infoling.org/elies/35/elies35.1-10.pdf (05-02-2015).
Pano Alamán, A. y Mancera Rueda, A. (2014b). Identidades falsas en Twitter: la ironía y el humor verbal como mecanismos paródicos. Discurso y sociedad, 8(3), pp. 507-536.
Papacharissi, Z. (2010). Conclusion: A networked self. En Papacharissi, Z. (Ed.). A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 304-318). New York: Routledge.
Papacharissi, Z. (ed.) (2011). A networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites. New York: Routledge.
Papacharissi, Z. (2012). Without you, I’m nothing: Performances of the self on Twitter. International Journal of Communication, 6, pp. 1989-2006.
Papacharissi, Z. y Oliveira, M. F. (2012). Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62, pp. 266-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x
Parmelee, J. H. y Bichard, S. L. (2012). Politics and the Twitter Revolution. How Tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. London: Lexington Books.
Pérez Fumero, E. (2013). La enfermedad de Hugo Chávez en la agenda de medios y públicos. Análisis del ‘hashtag’ #ElMundoEstaconChavez desde la teoría del ‘framing’. Index.Comunicación, 3, pp. 63-85.
Placencia, M. E. (2008). El estudio de la cortesía en español. Presente y futuro. En L. Cortés et al. (Eds.). Discurso y oralidad. Homenaje al Profesor José Jesús de Bustos Tovar. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
Placencia, M. E. (2011) ¡Estás full linda! El impacto del nivel socioeconómico en la realización de cumplidos entre mujeres en Quito. En Alcoba, S. y Poch, D. (Eds.). Cortesía y Publicidad (pp. 115-136). Barcelona: Ariel.
Placencia, M. E. y Yépez Lasso, M. (1999). Compliments in Ecuadorian Spanish. Lengua, 9, pp. 83-121.
Placencia, M. E. y Lower, A. (2013). “Your kids are stinking cute”. Complimenting behaviour on Facebook among family and Friends. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10 (4), pp. 617-646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0029
Reyes, A., Rosso, P. y Buscaldi, D. (2012). From humor recognition to irony detection: the figurative language of social media. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 74, pp. 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2012.02.005
Romero, D., Meeder, B. y Kleinberg, J. (2011). Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion in Twitter. International WWW Conference. Recuperdado de: http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/www11-hashtags.pdf (05-02-2015).
Rosenberg, J. y Egbert, N. (2011). Online impression management: personality traits and concerns for secondary goals as predictors of self-presentation tactics on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17 (1), pp. 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01560.x
Ross, C. et al. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (2), pp. 578-586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024
Santamaría García, C. (2013a). A compelling need to evaluate: social networks as tools for the expression of affect, judgement and appreciation. En Kecskes. I. y J. Romero-Trillo (Eds.). Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics (pp. 459-478). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Santamaría García, C. (2013b). Evaluative discourse and politeness in university students’ communication through social networking sites. En Thompson, G. y Alba-Juez, L. (Eds.). Evaluation in Context (pp. 387-411). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shaffer, E., Freund, L. y Welch, M. (2013). Tweeting the Government: Preliminary findings from a genre analysis of Canadian federal government tweets, GRAND, mayo 14-15. Recuperado de: http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1022&context=elizabeth_shaffer (05-02-2015).
Social Media (2010). II estudio para las redes sociales IAB Spain. Solo Marketing. Recuperado de: http://www.solomarketing.es/ii-estudio-para-las-redes-sociales-iab-spain (05-02-2015).
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Rapport management: A framework for analysis. En Spencer-Oatey, H. (Ed.). Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Culture (pp. 11-46). London: Continuum.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, pp. 639-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004
Spencer-Oatey, H. y Ruhi, S. (2007). Identity perspectives on face and (im)politeness. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics, 39, pp. 635-786. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.003
Tsur, O. y Rappoport, A. (2012). What’s in a hashtag? Content-based prediction of the spread of ideas in microblogging communities. WSDM’12, february 8-12, Recuperado de: http://eprints.pascal-network.org/archive/00009315/01/wsdm308-tsur.pdf (05-02-2015).
Valdés, G. y Pino, C. (1981). ”Muy a tus órdenes”: compliment responses among Mexican-American bilinguals. Language in Society, 10, pp. 53-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500008423
Van Dijk, T. (1997). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: SAGE.
Van Doorn, N. (2010). The ties that bind: the networked performance of gender, sexuality and friendship on MySpace. New Media & Society, 12(4), pp. 583-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342766
Varela, J. (2008). Google cumple diez años. Periodistas 21, 09-09-2008. Recuperado de: http://www.periodistas21.com/2008/09/google-cumple-diez-aos.html (05-02-2015).
Vivas Márquez, J. (2014). La cortesía valorizadora en las redes sociales. Análisis de un corpus de publicaciones en Facebook. Pragmalingüística, 22, pp. 154-172.
Watts, R. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184
Watts, R. (2008). Rudeness, conceptual blending theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 4 (2), pp. 289-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2008.014
West, L. y Trester, A. M. (2013). Facework on Facebook: conversations on Social Media. En Tannen, D. y Trester, A. M. (Eds.). Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media (pp. 133-154). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Whalter, J. B. y Parks, M. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. En Knapp, M. L. y Daly, J. A. (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Yus Ramos, F. (2001). Ciberpragmática. Barcelona: Ariel.
Yus Ramos, F. (2007). Virtualidades reales. Nuevas fronteras de comunidad en la era de Internet. Alicante: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alicante.
Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society, 13 (5), pp. 788-806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385097
Zappavigna, M. (2012). The Discourse of Twitter and Social Media. London: Continuum.
Zhang W. y Kramarae, C. (2014). SlutWalk on connected screens: Multiple framings of a social media discussion. Journal of Pragmatics, 73, pp. 66-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.008
Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S. y Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (5), pp. 1816-1836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012
Zhao, D. y Rosson, M. B. (2009). How and why people Twitter: The role that microblogging plays in informal communication at work. Proceedings of the ACM 2009. International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 243-252). New York: ACM.
Zimmerman, K. (2005). Construcción de la identidad y anticortesía verbal. Estudio de conversaciones entre jóvenes masculinos. En Bravo, D. (Ed.). Estudios de la (des)cortesía en español. Categorías conceptuales y aplicaciones a corpora orales y escritos (pp. 245-271). Buenos Aires: Dunken.
Copyright (c) 2015 Ana Mancera Mancera Rueda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Texts in Process (TEP) is a non-commercial open-access scholarly journal governed by a Creative Commons Recognition 4.0 International license. It follows a full and unrestricted open access, without charges or fees for shipping, reviewing, processing and publishing articles. Users can read, download without registering, distribute, print or link the complete texts of numbers and articles, without the permission of the editors or authors. There is also no charge to publish (APCs), being applicable to the entire editorial process. The authors retain their intellectual rights at all times.
ASICE-EDICE Programme has always believed that non-commercial, open, unlimited and unrestricted access to specialized academic publications is a vehicle for academic freedom and scientific rigor. It adheres and shares the Declaration of Mexico and DORA to guarantee the protection of academic and scientific production in Open Access.
